Skip to main content
COVID-19 In Vitro Diagnostic Devices and Test Methods Database

Scientific literature on COVID-19 Test Methods and Devices - detail

Comparison of copan ESwab and FLOQSwab for COVID-19 diagnosis: working around a supply shortage

Detection Principle
NucleicAcid-PCR based
Target
UTR and envelope
Testing Method Category
RT-PCR
Testing Method
; Corman et al. on the Rotor-gene Q (Qiagen, Germany)
Testing Method - Additional Info
comparison of specimens collected with FLOQSwab preserved in universal transport medium (Copan UTM system)and flocked regular nylon tip swab preserved in liquid Amies (ESwab collection system; Copan). using two distinct extraction/real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR): ExK TNA-2 extraction strip and detection; NucliSENS EasyMAG (bioMérieux, France) and detection performed on the Rotor-gene Q (Qiagen, Germany).
Reported Performance
BD Max sensitivity:100%; specificity: 100%. Rotor geneQ: sensitivity:97,1%; specificity: 100%
Sample Size
94 patients
Peer-reviewed
yes

The database contains available information from scientific literature that is being updated periodically. Please note that the provided information (as retrieved from analysed papers) is provided only for devices commercially available with CE-IVD mark. Acknowledgements