SARS-CoV-2 detection in different respiratory sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Detection Principle
review
Target
mixed
Testing Method Category
Other
Testing Method
mixed
Testing Method - Additional Info
comparison of respiratory sampling strategies
Reported Performance
percentage of positive tests: 75% (oropharyngeal swab, 0–7 dpo), 35% (oropharyngeal swab, 8–14 dpo), 12% (oropharyngeal swab, +14 dpo), 80% (nasopharyngeal swabs, 0–7 dpo), 59% (nasopharyngeal swabs 8–14 dpo), 36% (nasopharyngeal swabs, +14 dpo), 98% (sputum, 0–7 dpo), 69% (sputum, 8–14 dpo), 46% (sputum, +14 dpo)
Sample Size
/
Assay Type
Peer-reviewed
yes
The database contains available information from scientific literature that is being updated periodically. Please note that the provided information (as retrieved from analysed papers) is provided only for devices commercially available with CE-IVD mark. Acknowledgements